Wow, awesome article!!!!
What I Learned at the Dog Show!
One of my FB friends, a fellow AMA member posted this article to her profile. I thought it was worthy of sharing. I think it does a nice job of answering some of the mystique surrounding dog shows and the contentiousness that comes from some in the AR community.
What I Learned at the Dog Show | HumaneWatch
What I Learned at the Dog Show | HumaneWatch
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Just read the article over on facebook. It's a really good article....hope it helps.
Just read this earlier on FB.......Tremendous article!!!!!
I particularly liked #7 regarding Cheetos. 
Great article. Thanks for posting Corina. Love it.
Thanks! I loved the article
Great article!!
Thanks for posting the link, Carina!
Thanks for posting the link, Carina!
It is my understanding the "contentiousness" from the HSUS/Animal Rights/Animal Welfare groups is more about concerns regarding the higher risk of genetic health problems which results from inbreeding of purebred dogs rather than the pet overpopulation problem.
And yes, since there has historically been a huge problem with inbreeding in show dogs, humane societies, animal rights and animal welfare groups around the world are trying to get the word out about these genetic concerns. They DO have lots of scientific data to back up their concerns.
If anyone is interested in reading some genetic studies about the risks of inbreeding in purebred dogs, PM me and I'll send you some links. I have everything from easy to read to more scientific studies with advanced genetic terminology.
Here's an article straight from the HSUS. (There's four parts to the article):
The Purebred Paradox : The Humane Society of the United States
And yes, since there has historically been a huge problem with inbreeding in show dogs, humane societies, animal rights and animal welfare groups around the world are trying to get the word out about these genetic concerns. They DO have lots of scientific data to back up their concerns.
If anyone is interested in reading some genetic studies about the risks of inbreeding in purebred dogs, PM me and I'll send you some links. I have everything from easy to read to more scientific studies with advanced genetic terminology.
Here's an article straight from the HSUS. (There's four parts to the article):
The Purebred Paradox : The Humane Society of the United States
Oh, so that's why they set dogs loose, poison them and try to legislate responsible breeders out of existence! (sarcasm)It is my understanding the "contentiousness" from the HSUS/Animal Rights/Animal Welfare groups is more about concerns regarding the higher risk of genetic health problems which results from inbreeding of purebred dogs rather than the pet overpopulation problem.
And yes, since there has historically been a huge problem with inbreeding in show dogs, humane societies, animal rights and animal welfare groups around the world are trying to get the word out about these genetic concerns. They DO have lots of scientific data to back up their concerns.
If anyone is interested in reading some genetic studies about the risks of inbreeding in purebred dogs, PM me and I'll send you some links. I have everything from easy to read to more scientific studies with advanced genetic terminology.
Here's an article straight from the HSUS. (There's four parts to the article):
The Purebred Paradox : The Humane Society of the United States
Show breeders are a small percentage of purebred dog breeders and shouldn't be blamed for the entire populations genetic issues. They are the ones screening for health issues and funding research. W/o show breeders, there wouldn't be an OFA to screen for hip dysplasia, there wouldn't be a genetic test for Von Willebrand Disease and there would be no Bile Acid Testing. Many genetic disorders would be extinct if not for the ignorant and careless breeders that throw any two dogs together.
Nice article. Thanks for sharing.
Wow.. what a wonderful article, Carina..thanks so much for sharing. Brought tears! Think that's not passion!!!One of my FB friends, a fellow AMA member posted this article to her profile. I thought it was worthy of sharing. I think it does a nice job of answering some of the mystique surrounding dog shows and the contentiousness that comes from some in the AR community.
What I Learned at the Dog Show | HumaneWatch
It is my understanding the "contentiousness" from the HSUS/Animal Rights/Animal Welfare groups is more about concerns regarding the higher risk of genetic health problems which results from inbreeding of purebred dogs rather than the pet overpopulation problem.
And yes, since there has historically been a huge problem with inbreeding in show dogs, humane societies, animal rights and animal welfare groups around the world are trying to get the word out about these genetic concerns. They DO have lots of scientific data to back up their concerns.
If anyone is interested in reading some genetic studies about the risks of inbreeding in purebred dogs, PM me and I'll send you some links. I have everything from easy to read to more scientific studies with advanced genetic terminology.
Here's an article straight from the HSUS. (There's four parts to the article):
The Purebred Paradox : The Humane Society of the United States
Couldn't have said it better myself... and yes, MY HACKLES are up as well. ANYONE can twist anything to "say" what they want it to, but the fact is... back yard breeders and puppymills are the reason purebred dogs have such bad health issues, NOT hobby show breeders. If somone knew ONE thing about line breeding, they wouldn't be commenting on it in such a negative manner. Line breeding can actually be used to get RID of health problems (if done properly) NOT increase them. You think SHOW people are the only ones "inbreeding!" Get a clue! Working for a vet, I see people with "inbred" litters all of the time. Woops.. forgot to keep sister and brother apart. You THINK they know what genetic skeletons are in the closets of their lines?? You need to be knowledgable about what this "gargon" means..not just recant from articles being written and public TV programs, which are completely one sided.Oh, so that's why they set dogs loose, poison them and try to legislate responsible breeders out of existence! (sarcasm)
Show breeders are a small percentage of purebred dog breeders and shouldn't be blamed for the entire populations genetic issues. They are the ones screening for health issues and funding research. W/o show breeders, there wouldn't be an OFA to screen for hip dysplasia, there wouldn't be a genetic test for Von Willebrand Disease and there would be no Bile Acid Testing. Many genetic disorders would be extinct if not for the ignorant and careless breeders that throw any two dogs together.
You know, people are so good at reading info and spitting it out without any knowledgable background of or on the information. This is why people use squirt bottles to make dogs stop barking!
i am also wary of HSUS, but i did read this article and here are the last few paragraphs. all of the firm examples of genetic diseases in pets are dogs that were purchased at pet stores. i think they do a good job of describing responsible breeders and pointing people in their direction if they can't find a pet in a shelter. every day i look at reina or stuart, i thank God that there are dedicated, responsible breeders out there
"When you can’t find the dog you’re looking for, however, responsible breeders are another option; they are devoted to their animals’ well-being and committed to placing them in loving homes. And if every shelter dog were adopted and every puppy mill were shuttered, there would still be a need for good breeders to supply dogs to American households.
Whether you decide to get your next dog from a shelter or a breeder who treated her parents like part of the family, here are smart ways to stack the deck in favor of finding a healthy pup.
• Do your research. Want a particular kind of dog? Check out the available dog health resources, such as the Canine Health Information Center (Canine Health Information Center) and the Canine Genetic Disease Network (Canine Genetic Diseases Network), to learn about what disorders your chosen breed may be prone to, as well as what genetic tests are available.
• Check with a rescue group. These groups know their favored breeds and are generally forthright about both their great qualities and the challenges they face. Not only will they try to find you a great dog who needs a home; they’ll be able to give you tips on any health issues the breed is prone to.
• Choose a responsible breeder. How can you tell? A good breeder lets you check out the place where she’s raising the puppies—frequently, her own home. She socializes her pups and doesn’t place them too early. She asks you lots of questions and is concerned about where her dogs are going. She’s able to provide papers that show not only the pup’s heritage but any genetic screening that was done on his parents. And she makes you promise to bring the dog back if you ever become unable to care for him.
• Be realistic. Sometimes, no matter how good a dog’s breeder was, no matter how carefully her parents were screened, she will get sick. There aren’t yet tests for all the genetic disorders out there, so now and then even the best of breeders get a sad surprise (and if one of their puppies does get sick, even years later, they will want to know). For dog owners, it’s good to have some money socked away in case the worst happens—and that goes for owners of purebreds and mutts alike.
• Consider adopting an older dog. Millions of adult dogs are in need of homes—and it is often easier to assess the health and temperament of an already mature companion. An added bonus is that these animals are usually housetrained and have passed the destructive teething and hyperactivity stages."
"When you can’t find the dog you’re looking for, however, responsible breeders are another option; they are devoted to their animals’ well-being and committed to placing them in loving homes. And if every shelter dog were adopted and every puppy mill were shuttered, there would still be a need for good breeders to supply dogs to American households.
Whether you decide to get your next dog from a shelter or a breeder who treated her parents like part of the family, here are smart ways to stack the deck in favor of finding a healthy pup.
• Do your research. Want a particular kind of dog? Check out the available dog health resources, such as the Canine Health Information Center (Canine Health Information Center) and the Canine Genetic Disease Network (Canine Genetic Diseases Network), to learn about what disorders your chosen breed may be prone to, as well as what genetic tests are available.
• Check with a rescue group. These groups know their favored breeds and are generally forthright about both their great qualities and the challenges they face. Not only will they try to find you a great dog who needs a home; they’ll be able to give you tips on any health issues the breed is prone to.
• Choose a responsible breeder. How can you tell? A good breeder lets you check out the place where she’s raising the puppies—frequently, her own home. She socializes her pups and doesn’t place them too early. She asks you lots of questions and is concerned about where her dogs are going. She’s able to provide papers that show not only the pup’s heritage but any genetic screening that was done on his parents. And she makes you promise to bring the dog back if you ever become unable to care for him.
• Be realistic. Sometimes, no matter how good a dog’s breeder was, no matter how carefully her parents were screened, she will get sick. There aren’t yet tests for all the genetic disorders out there, so now and then even the best of breeders get a sad surprise (and if one of their puppies does get sick, even years later, they will want to know). For dog owners, it’s good to have some money socked away in case the worst happens—and that goes for owners of purebreds and mutts alike.
• Consider adopting an older dog. Millions of adult dogs are in need of homes—and it is often easier to assess the health and temperament of an already mature companion. An added bonus is that these animals are usually housetrained and have passed the destructive teething and hyperactivity stages."
Thank you Tami for pointing out the more balanced elements of that article. It is perhaps surprising that an article from HSUS would offer such balance as the propaganda they use often lacks it. I will say I was surprised by some of the very useful elements of that article as the way it was presented here in this thread above reflected a much more one sided view.
I was particularly interested in this section:
The AKC and its member breed clubs have devoted considerable effort to improving the health of purebreds, in part by funding research to find the genetic markers tied to certain disorders. In 1995, the AKC launched the AKC Canine Health Foundation, a charitable organization that raises funds to support canine health research; the AKC gives the foundation $1 million in annual funding.
Dedicated breeders have also made significant strides, says veterinarian Fran Smith, citing the success in correcting a disorder known as collie eye anomaly. “In order to have that pretty collie head shape, it doesn’t leave as much room in the skull for a particular eye shape,” says Smith, who serves on the AKC’s Canine Health and Welfare Advisory Panel and is president of the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals. “But collie breeders—the serious collie breeders—have made a huge impact in selecting for dogs who have the correct eye shape without that eye problem.”
...
Smith doesn’t blame written breed standards as much as people’s interpretation of those standards. What needs correcting, she says, is “this idea that if one wrinkle is good, then 12 wrinkles is better. If a 4-pound Chihuahua is good, then a 1-pound Chihuahua would be spectacular.” It’s a trend that even prompted Consumer Reports to issue a warning in 2003, telling readers that the “demand for ever-more-perfect purebred dogs has concentrated bad recessive genes and turned many pets into medical nightmares.”
I found myself very drawn to that particular section. I do feel that some breeds are truly suffering from extremes. However, if we look at a standard such as we have in Maltese we notice the key words about balance. IMHO our standard is a work that promotes the health and welfare of our breed. In fact, our standard has been changed by dedicated and concerned breeders to reflect concern about the health and welfare of the dogs. Like the quote about the chihuahua above, once people believed that breeding a Maltese under 3 pounds was most desirable (our standard in the early part of the 20th century). Well intentioned breeders recognized the dangers inherit in that and changed it in the most recent standard. In other words, they took out the words that suggested a dangerous extreme.
Responsible breeders with the help of their parent clubs should make such adaptations. There are certainly faults in some breeds that are related to choices that breeders and judges have made. However, it will be the responsible breeders who care about those breeds that will fix them. I certainly do not expect the puppy mills who are churning out "designer-mixed breeds" and extremes to appeal to a pet market such a "muzzless-teacups" to be part of that solution.
As pet owners, I believe we have a responsibility to learn about the steps that responsible breeders are taking to ensure the health of their dogs, including making decisions about breeding away from genetic faults and dangerous extremes. This is why it is so important to support responsible, ethical breeders and avoid those greeders who are breeding to fill a pet market. Ethical show breeders a put a desire to preserve the breed for the future foremost in their minds, they are not breeding for the buyer with the most money, but for a higher purpose. A breed that will continue to thrive for even longer than its ancient history.
I was particularly interested in this section:
The AKC and its member breed clubs have devoted considerable effort to improving the health of purebreds, in part by funding research to find the genetic markers tied to certain disorders. In 1995, the AKC launched the AKC Canine Health Foundation, a charitable organization that raises funds to support canine health research; the AKC gives the foundation $1 million in annual funding.
Dedicated breeders have also made significant strides, says veterinarian Fran Smith, citing the success in correcting a disorder known as collie eye anomaly. “In order to have that pretty collie head shape, it doesn’t leave as much room in the skull for a particular eye shape,” says Smith, who serves on the AKC’s Canine Health and Welfare Advisory Panel and is president of the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals. “But collie breeders—the serious collie breeders—have made a huge impact in selecting for dogs who have the correct eye shape without that eye problem.”
...
Smith doesn’t blame written breed standards as much as people’s interpretation of those standards. What needs correcting, she says, is “this idea that if one wrinkle is good, then 12 wrinkles is better. If a 4-pound Chihuahua is good, then a 1-pound Chihuahua would be spectacular.” It’s a trend that even prompted Consumer Reports to issue a warning in 2003, telling readers that the “demand for ever-more-perfect purebred dogs has concentrated bad recessive genes and turned many pets into medical nightmares.”
I found myself very drawn to that particular section. I do feel that some breeds are truly suffering from extremes. However, if we look at a standard such as we have in Maltese we notice the key words about balance. IMHO our standard is a work that promotes the health and welfare of our breed. In fact, our standard has been changed by dedicated and concerned breeders to reflect concern about the health and welfare of the dogs. Like the quote about the chihuahua above, once people believed that breeding a Maltese under 3 pounds was most desirable (our standard in the early part of the 20th century). Well intentioned breeders recognized the dangers inherit in that and changed it in the most recent standard. In other words, they took out the words that suggested a dangerous extreme.
Responsible breeders with the help of their parent clubs should make such adaptations. There are certainly faults in some breeds that are related to choices that breeders and judges have made. However, it will be the responsible breeders who care about those breeds that will fix them. I certainly do not expect the puppy mills who are churning out "designer-mixed breeds" and extremes to appeal to a pet market such a "muzzless-teacups" to be part of that solution.
As pet owners, I believe we have a responsibility to learn about the steps that responsible breeders are taking to ensure the health of their dogs, including making decisions about breeding away from genetic faults and dangerous extremes. This is why it is so important to support responsible, ethical breeders and avoid those greeders who are breeding to fill a pet market. Ethical show breeders a put a desire to preserve the breed for the future foremost in their minds, they are not breeding for the buyer with the most money, but for a higher purpose. A breed that will continue to thrive for even longer than its ancient history.
:goodpost:Thank you Tami for pointing out the more balanced elements of that article. It is perhaps surprising that an article from HSUS would offer such balance as the propaganda they use often lacks it. I will say I was surprised by some of the very useful elements of that article as the way it was presented here in this thread above reflected a much more one sided view.
I was particularly interested in this section:
The AKC and its member breed clubs have devoted considerable effort to improving the health of purebreds, in part by funding research to find the genetic markers tied to certain disorders. In 1995, the AKC launched the AKC Canine Health Foundation, a charitable organization that raises funds to support canine health research; the AKC gives the foundation $1 million in annual funding.
Dedicated breeders have also made significant strides, says veterinarian Fran Smith, citing the success in correcting a disorder known as collie eye anomaly. “In order to have that pretty collie head shape, it doesn’t leave as much room in the skull for a particular eye shape,” says Smith, who serves on the AKC’s Canine Health and Welfare Advisory Panel and is president of the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals. “But collie breeders—the serious collie breeders—have made a huge impact in selecting for dogs who have the correct eye shape without that eye problem.”
...
Smith doesn’t blame written breed standards as much as people’s interpretation of those standards. What needs correcting, she says, is “this idea that if one wrinkle is good, then 12 wrinkles is better. If a 4-pound Chihuahua is good, then a 1-pound Chihuahua would be spectacular.” It’s a trend that even prompted Consumer Reports to issue a warning in 2003, telling readers that the “demand for ever-more-perfect purebred dogs has concentrated bad recessive genes and turned many pets into medical nightmares.”
I found myself very drawn to that particular section. I do feel that some breeds are truly suffering from extremes. However, if we look at a standard such as we have in Maltese we notice the key words about balance. IMHO our standard is a work that promotes the health and welfare of our breed. In fact, our standard has been changed by dedicated and concerned breeders to reflect concern about the health and welfare of the dogs. Like the quote about the chihuahua above, once people believed that breeding a Maltese under 3 pounds was most desirable (our standard in the early part of the 20th century). Well intentioned breeders recognized the dangers inherit in that and changed it in the most recent standard. In other words, they took out the words that suggested a dangerous extreme.
Responsible breeders with the help of their parent clubs should make such adaptations. There are certainly faults in some breeds that are related to choices that breeders and judges have made. However, it will be the responsible breeders who care about those breeds that will fix them. I certainly do not expect the puppy mills who are churning out "designer-mixed breeds" and extremes to appeal to a pet market such a "muzzless-teacups" to be part of that solution.
As pet owners, I believe we have a responsibility to learn about the steps that responsible breeders are taking to ensure the health of their dogs, including making decisions about breeding away from genetic faults and dangerous extremes. This is why it is so important to support responsible, ethical breeders and avoid those greeders who are breeding to fill a pet market. Ethical show breeders a put a desire to preserve the breed for the future foremost in their minds, they are not breeding for the buyer with the most money, but for a higher purpose. A breed that will continue to thrive for even longer than its ancient history.
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Maltese Dogs Forum : Spoiled Maltese Forums
A forum community dedicated to Maltese owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about breeding, health, behavior, housing, adopting, care, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Recommended Communities
